State of JavaScript 2024: Librerie

Librerie

While the JavaScript ecosystem is still quite fragmented, it's nice to see that some of the most used libraries are also the most appreciated.

Make sure to explore our new grouping and sorting options to figure out which libraries get the most love… or the least!

Link alla sezione
Libraries Experience & Sentiment

Webpack is the most-used JavaScript tool, but not the most-loved. That title instead belongs to Vite, with 56% of positive opinions (note that remaining neutral was also an option this year). Astoundingly, Vite was also the third most used tool overall despite having only been around for a relatively short time!

React on the other hand came in second not only in the most-used list, but also in the most-loved rankings – which is quite the staying power for a project that is over 10 years old! It's also worth nothing that React sports the highest proportion of users actively picking a sentiment.

Filter by:

Group by:

Sort by:

85.3%

12.6%

11,980

81.1%

16.8%

13,117

78.1%

17.6%

11,969

71.4%

23.7%

3.8%

12,367

54%

44.3%

12,754

51.7%

32.9%

14.7%

12,281

50.9%

47.3%

13,090

50.1%

48.5%

13,094

49.9%

14.1%

35.4%

11,866

49.6%

34.5%

15.3%

11,891

Experience

Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.

Sentiment

Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.

Link alla sezione
Cambiamenti nel tempo

JavaScript libraries commonly display a "boomerang" pattern over time: boosted by early positivity (line goes right), usage increases (line shoots up), but users then get confronted with more edge cases and real-world issues, and opinions can become more negative (line veers left).

So it's always interesting to see projects that manage to buck this trend, such as Vue and Angular, which have both managed to gain positive opinions again even after a couple years of less favorable results.

Filter by:

Leggenda

Crescente popolarità

Popolarità in calo

Alcune righe saltano anni.
Non vengono mostrate le tecnologie con un solo anno di dati.
Formula velocità = (opinione più recente - opinione più vecchia) + (utilizzo più recente) - (utilizzo più vecchio)
Una velocità positiva significa che l'utilizzo e/o le opinioni positive sono aumentate nel tempo.

We asked members of the JavaScript community to share their “pick of the year”

My 2024 Pick: gsap-video-export

Chris made this super handy tool to export your GSAP animations to video. It's made my life much easier and my videos much smoother - no more low quality screen recordings for me!

We asked members of the JavaScript community to share their “pick of the year”

Cassie Evans

Does a little bit of everything at GSAP

Link alla sezione
Elenco dei livelli della libreria

Front-end Frameworks

Meta-Frameworks

Test

Mobile & Computer

Build Tools

Monorepo Tools

90%

98%

98%

94%

94%

93%

91%

91%

90%

80%

88%

88%

87%

86%

85%

81%

80%

80%

80%

60%

77%

76%

75%

74%

73%

71%

70%

70%

68%

68%

67%

67%

65%

64%

62%

61%

60%

54%

44%

35%

33%

27%

25%

19%

Questo grafico classifica le librerie in base al loro rapporto di conservazione (percentuale di utenti chi userebbe di nuovo una libreria). Si noti che le librerie utilizzate da meno del 10% dei partecipanti al sondaggio non sono inclusi.

Link alla sezione
Retention vs Usage

It's notable that there were only three libraries that captured over 50% of respondent usage while maintaining a >50% retention percentage: React, Jest, and Vite – the sign of a relatively fragmented ecosystem.

Front-end Frameworks

Meta-Frameworks

Test

Mobile & Computer

Build Tools

Monorepo Tools

Questo grafico mostra il rapporto di fidelizzazione di ciascuna tecnologia rispetto al conteggio di utenti totale. Può essere suddiviso in quattro quadranti:

VALUTAZIONE: basso utilizzo, alta ritenzione. Tecnologie da tenere d'occhio.
ADOTTA: utilizzo elevato, ritenzione elevata. Tecnologie sicure da adottare.
EVITARE: basso utilizzo, bassa ritenzione. Tecnologie che probabilmente è meglio evitare attualmente.
ANALISI: utilizzo elevato, bassa ritenzione. Rivaluta queste tecnologie se le stai attualmente utilizzando.

Link alla sezione
Risorse consigliate

Enterprise UI Development: Testing & Code Quality

Steve Kinney

Temporal

Enterprise UI Development: Testing & Code Quality

Learn unit testing with Vitest, continuous integration via GitHub Actions, component and accessibility testing with Ax, mocking techniques, and code standard enforcement using ESLint and Husky & Lint-Staged.

Evgenii Ray

Staff UI Engineer

Front-End System Design

Dive into front-end system design to create scalable, efficient user interfaces! Master core UI fundamentals: box model, browser rendering, DOM manipulation, state management, and performance.

Grazie ai nostri partners per averci supportato! Scopri di più.

Librerie

Link alla sezioneLibraries Experience & Sentiment

Filter by:

Group by:

Sort by:

webpack

React

Vite

Jest

Next.js

Storybook

Vue.js

Angular

tsc CLI

esbuild

Experience

Sentiment

Link alla sezioneCambiamenti nel tempo

Filter by:

My 2024 Pick: gsap-video-export

Cassie Evans

Link alla sezioneElenco dei livelli della libreria

Link alla sezioneRetention vs Usage

Link alla sezioneRisorse consigliate

Enterprise UI Development: Testing & Code Quality

Front-End System Design

Link alla sezione
Libraries Experience & Sentiment

Link alla sezione
Cambiamenti nel tempo

Link alla sezione
Elenco dei livelli della libreria

Link alla sezione
Retention vs Usage

Link alla sezione
Risorse consigliate