Ir para o conteúdo

Metadata

Additional metadata collected about respondents.

The language respondents selected to fill out the survey.

0%
16%
33%
49%
65%
82%
1

Inglês

11,429
2

Espanhol

769
3

Francês

369
4

Alemão

270
5

Russo

255
6

Chinês (Simplificado)

215
7

Japonês

95
8

Polonês

76
9

Holandês

40
10

Chinês (Tradicional)

37
11

Sem resposta

460
0%
16%
33%
49%
65%
82%
% de respostas da pesquisa

Survey Completion

The proportion of the survey filled out by respondents.

0%
12%
23%
35%
46%
58%
1

0-10%

836
2

10-20%

360
3

20-30%

304
4

30-40%

289
5

40-50%

211
6

50-60%

195
7

60-70%

278
8

70-80%

467
9

80-90%

2,109
10

90-100%

8,106
11

100

846
12

Sem resposta

14
0%
12%
23%
35%
46%
58%
% de respostas da pesquisa

Authentication

Whether respondents signed in or filled out the survey as guests.

0%
11%
21%
32%
42%
53%
1

Guest Account

7,392
2

Logged-in Account

6,609
3

Sem resposta

14
0%
11%
21%
32%
42%
53%
% de respostas da pesquisa

What device was used to take the survey.

0%
9%
19%
28%
37%
47%
1

Desktop

2

Mobile

3

Tablet

4

Sem resposta

0%
9%
19%
28%
37%
47%
% de respostas da pesquisa

What browser was used to take the survey.

0%
8%
16%
24%
32%
40%
4

Microsoft Edge

6

Samsung Internet for Android

7

Yandex Browser

8

WeChat

9

Sem resposta

10

Outras respostas

Respostas correspondentes a “Outras respostas” 5
0%
8%
16%
24%
32%
40%
% de respostas da pesquisa

What OS version was used to take the survey.

0%
7%
15%
22%
29%
37%
6

Sem resposta

7

Outras respostas

Respostas correspondentes a “Outras respostas” 6
0%
7%
15%
22%
29%
37%
% de respostas da pesquisa

Previous Surveys

This chart shows which other Devographics surveys this year's respondents had previously taken part in.

The fact that a sizeable segment of this year's respondents had also taken other surveys points to web development not being quite as fragmented as one might think – even if you primarily write JavaScript, keeping up with CSS and the web platform is still key!

Note that we can only generate this datapoint for respondents taking the survey while logged-in. Guest respondents appear as “No Answer”.

0%
15%
31%
46%
62%
77%
6

Respostas eliminadas

2
7

Sem resposta

10,827
0%
15%
31%
46%
62%
77%
% de respostas da pesquisa

Participation Count

This chart shows how many times this year's respondents had taken part in a State of JS survey before.

The fact that the largest bucket consists of new respondents means we are successfully reaching a new population, which mitigates bias that might carry over from our existing audience. But it also points to the challenges of getting people to consistently fill out a survey year after year.

Note that we can only generate this datapoint for respondents taking the survey while logged-in. Guest respondents appear as “No Answer”.

0%
13%
26%
38%
51%
64%
1

0

2,736
2

1

1,128
3

2

569
4

3

269
5

4

203
6

5

146
7

Respostas eliminadas

1
8

Sem resposta

8,963
0%
13%
26%
38%
51%
64%
% de respostas da pesquisa

Responses Over Time

Chronological breakdown of when responses were collected.

0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
11/13
11/16
11/19
11/22
11/25
11/28
12/01
12/04
12/07
12/10
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Quantidade

The majority of respondents knew about the survey from previous years. It's also worth highlighting that the Angular and Nuxt homepages featured banners pointing their users to the survey; and that Bluesky came in at number 5 despite this being the first time appearing as a traffic source for the survey.

We also made special outreach efforts (full report here) focused on attracting more women developers.

0%
8%
16%
24%
32%
40%
2

9

Workplace

0%
8%
16%
24%
32%
40%
% de respostas da pesquisa
Respondent source is computed based on referrer data, URL tracking data, and self-reported answers.